Goldman Sachs: AI Is Cutting 16,000 U.S. Jobs Per Month

Goldman Sachs has put a hard number on the AI labor story traders have been circling for two years. New research by Goldman Sachs economists finds that AI is already a measurable drag on the U.S. job market, erasing roughly 16,000 net jobs per month over the past year, with the pain falling hardest on Gen Z and entry-level workers.

What the Goldman note actually says

The bank’s April 2026 report estimates that artificial intelligence has reduced monthly US payroll growth by roughly 16,000 positions over the past year, enough to nudge the unemployment rate up by 0.1 percentage points. The 16,000 headline is a net figure, and the gross churn underneath is bigger.

Goldman’s breakdown shows AI substitution wiped out roughly 25,000 jobs per month in the past year, while augmentation added back about 9,000. That works out to roughly 192,000 positions annualized, and it marks the first time a major Wall Street research desk has attempted to isolate AI’s contribution to job losses from broader macroeconomic trends like offshoring, cyclical contraction, and voluntary attrition.

Who is getting hit

Telephone operators, insurance claims clerks, and bill collectors face the highest substitution risk, with customer service representatives and data entry staff sitting close behind.

Gen Z workers are disproportionately concentrated in the exact types of routine, white-collar, and administrative roles, data entry, customer service, legal support, billing, that AI is best at automating, and without the accumulated experience and specialized judgment that insulate senior workers, they have little buffer against displacement.

Do you want to see how to make more plays? Do you want to find gains yourself?

Unusual Whales helps you find market opportunities through our market tide, historical options flow, GEX, and much, much more.

Create a free account here to start conquering the market with Unusual Whales.

The apprenticeship problem

Historically, junior roles served a dual purpose: they got work done, and they trained the next generation of senior professionals, so when AI eliminates junior roles, organizations may solve their short-term labor cost problem while creating a long-term leadership pipeline problem.

The report cites law firms as a leading indicator, with several major firms reducing associate hiring by 25 to 40 percent since 2024, using AI for document review, contract analysis, and legal research that associates previously handled, while partners report higher margins. The market implication: margin expansion today, thinner senior talent benches later.

The macro read for traders

A 0.1 point drag on unemployment is small in isolation, but it changes the composition of payrolls the Fed is looking at. Softer entry-level hiring plus productivity-driven margin gains at the firms deploying AI is a bullish setup for large-cap operators and a headwind for staffing-heavy business models.

Watch how this feeds into Fed commentary and how consensus reacts to the next payrolls print. For more, see other coverage on Unusual Whales news.

Options market and stocks to watch

GS: watch for reaction on any follow-up notes from Goldman Sachs economists that shift the AI-labor narrative or Fed pricing.

MSFT and NVDA: watch for flow tied to the enterprise AI adoption thesis that underpins these substitution estimates.

CRM: watch for positioning around AI-driven customer service automation, one of the roles Goldman flagged as high-substitution.

MAN and staffing names: watch for weakness if the entry-level hiring slowdown broadens.

Want more market intelligence? Create your free Unusual Whales account for options flow, market tide, GEX, and the full toolkit.