Employers use personal data to set the lowest salary you'll accept: MW

Employers are increasingly turning to algorithms that ingest workers’ personal data to figure out the smallest paycheck a candidate will accept, according to a MarketWatch report on the rise of so-called surveillance wages.

What are surveillance wages

Surveillance wages are a system in which wages are based not on an employee’s performance or seniority, but on formulas that use their personal data, often collected without employees’ knowledge.

Some systems use signals associated with financial vulnerability, including data on whether a prospective employee has taken out a payday loan or has a high credit-card balance, to infer the lowest pay a candidate might accept. Companies can also scrape candidates’ public social-media pages to determine if they are more likely to join a union or could become pregnant.

Who is reportedly using it

An August 2025 report from the Washington Center for Equitable Growth identified major U.S. employers as being among the customers of these vendors, including Intuit, Salesforce, Colgate-Palmolive, Amwell and Healthcare Services Group.

The report does not claim that all employers using these systems engage in algorithmic wage surveillance. Instead, it warns that the growing use of algorithmic tools to analyze workers’ personal data can enable pay practices that prioritize cost-cutting over transparency or fairness.

Colgate-Palmolive said it does not use algorithmic wage-setting tools to make compensation decisions for employees or to set new-hire salaries, and Intuit said it does not engage in such practices.

Do you want to see how to make more plays? Do you want to find gains yourself?

Unusual Whales helps you find market opportunities through our market tide, historical options flow, GEX, and much, much more.

Create a free account here to start conquering the market with Unusual Whales.

Why it matters for markets

The HR-AI stack is turning into a real spend category. The key risk is discovery in wage discrimination lawsuits, while the key opportunity is the growing HR AI market.

For investors, the trade-off is margin expansion from lower labor costs versus regulatory and reputational risk if enforcement tightens around algorithmic wage-setting.

The regulatory backdrop

A first-of-its-kind audit of 500 labor-management artificial-intelligence companies by Veena Dubal, a law professor at University of California, Irvine, and Wilneida Negrón, a tech strategist, found that employers in the healthcare, customer service, logistics and retail industries are customers of vendors whose tools are designed to enable this practice.

State-level pay transparency laws and pending AI-in-employment rules could reshape how these tools are deployed, and any federal action would sit on top of that.

Options market and stocks to watch

Names called out in the underlying research, plus adjacent HR-tech exposure, are worth monitoring for headline risk and flow:

• INTU: watch for reaction to being named in the report, given its payroll and workforce data footprint.
• CRM: watch for questions around workforce analytics products and enterprise HR tooling.
• CL: watch for follow-up on the company’s denial that it uses algorithmic wage-setting tools.
• AMWL: watch for any commentary tied to the report given its smaller float and healthcare exposure.
• HCSG: watch for labor-cost narrative shifts as a services-heavy employer.

Want more market intelligence? Create your free Unusual Whales account for options flow, market tide, GEX, and the full toolkit.